Bibliography#
Michel Bailly and Daniel Tondeur. Recycle optimization in non-linear productive chromatography—I Mixing recycle with fresh feed. Chemical Engineering Science, 37(8):1199–1212, 1982.
Jana Dienstbier, Johannes Schmölder, Robert Burlacu, Frauke Liers, and Malte Kaspereit. Global optimization of batch and steady-state recycling chromatography based on the equilibrium model. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 135:106687, 2020. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098135419307409, doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106687.
William Heymann, Juliane Glaser, Fabrice Schlegel, Will Johnson, Pablo Rolandi, and Eric von Lieres. Advanced score system and automated search strategies for parameter estimation in mechanistic chromatography modeling. Journal of Chromatography A, 1661:462693, 2022. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967321008153, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462693.
Anders Holmqvist, Fredrik Magnusson, and Bernt Nilsson. Dynamic Multi-Objective Optimization of Batch Chromatographic Separation Processes. In Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, volume 37, pages 815–820. Elsevier, 2015. doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63578-5.50131-6.
D. Whitney King and Dana R. Kester. A general approach for calculating polyprotic acid speciation and buffer capacity. Journal of Chemical Education, 67(11):932, 1990. URL: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed067p932, doi:10.1021/ed067p932.
Samuel Leweke and Eric von Lieres. Chromatography Analysis and Design Toolkit (CADET). Computers & Chemical Engineering, 113:274–294, 2018. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098135418300966, doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.02.025.
O. Levenspiel. Chemical Reaction Engineering. Wiley, 1999. ISBN 978-0-471-25424-9. doi:10.1021/ie990488g.
M. J. D. Powell. A Direct Search Optimization Method That Models the Objective and Constraint Functions by Linear Interpolation. In Susana Gomez and Jean-Pierre Hennart, editors, Advances in Optimization and Numerical Analysis, Mathematics and Its Applications, pages 51–67. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1994. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8330-5_4.
J. Blank and K. Deb. Pymoo: multi-objective optimization in python. IEEE Access, 8:89497–89509, 2020.
Tuomo Sainio and Malte Kaspereit. Analysis of steady state recycling chromatography using equilibrium theory. Separation and Purification Technology, 66(1):9–18, 2009. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2008.12.005.
H. Schmidt-Traub, M. Schulte, and A. Seidel-Morgenstern. Preparative Chromatography. Wiley, 2020. ISBN 9783527816316.
SciPy 1.0 Contributors, Pauli Virtanen, Ralf Gommers, Travis E. Oliphant, Matt Haberland, Tyler Reddy, David Cournapeau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, Stéfan J. van der Walt, Matthew Brett, Joshua Wilson, K. Jarrod Millman, Nikolay Mayorov, Andrew R. J. Nelson, Eric Jones, Robert Kern, Eric Larson, C J Carey, İlhan Polat, Yu Feng, Eric W. Moore, Jake VanderPlas, Denis Laxalde, Josef Perktold, Robert Cimrman, Ian Henriksen, E. A. Quintero, Charles R. Harris, Anne M. Archibald, Antônio H. Ribeiro, Fabian Pedregosa, and Paul van Mulbregt. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nature Methods, 17(3):261–272, March 2020. URL: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-019-0686-2 (visited on 2020-05-20), doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2.
Johannes Schmölder and Malte Kaspereit. A Modular Framework for the Modelling and Optimization of Advanced Chromatographic Processes. Processes, 8(1):65, 2020. doi:10.3390/pr8010065.
Haitham Seada and Kalyanmoy Deb. A unified evolutionary optimization procedure for single, multiple, and many objectives. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 20(3):358–369, 2016. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2015.2459718.
Yichu Shan and Andreas Seidel-Morgenstern. Analysis of the isolation of a target component using multicomponent isocratic preparative elution chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A, 1041(1):53–62, 2004. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2004.04.061.
Yohannis Mitiku Tobo, Jan Bartacek, and Ingmar Nopens. Linking CFD and Kinetic Models in Anaerobic Digestion Using a Compartmental Model Approach. Processes, 8(6):703, June 2020. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/8/6/703 (visited on 2020-11-20), doi:10.3390/pr8060703.